XDEF vs. COMT
XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. XDEF is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. XDEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
XDEF vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XDEF
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
XDEF vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | -99.17% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEF and COMT is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEF vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
XDEF
COMT
XDEF vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEF | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 0.20 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
XDEF vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEF drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than COMT's maximum drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEF and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEF | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.30% | -51.89% | -47.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.26% | -4.82% | -94.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.45% | -24.07% | -46.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility
XDEF vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEF | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 157.63% | 21.29% | +136.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 157.63% | 21.06% | +136.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 157.63% | 18.89% | +138.74% |
XDEF vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDEF vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
XDEF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEF and COMT have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for XDEF.
XDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDEF and 0.48% for COMT.
Find the right allocation for XDEF and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer