XDEF vs. CMDT
XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. XDEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.
Performance
XDEF vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XDEF
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMDT
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -8.86%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEF vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | -99.17% |
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 13.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEF and CMDT is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEF vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank
XDEF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CMDT
XDEF vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDEF | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDEF vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEF drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEF and CMDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEF | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.30% | -11.11% | -88.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.26% | -11.11% | -88.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.02% | -2.77% | -70.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility
XDEF vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEF | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.20% | 12.65% | +135.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.20% | 12.24% | +135.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.20% | 12.24% | +135.96% |
XDEF vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDEF vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison
XDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than CMDT's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 2.67% | 3.04% | 8.80% | 2.71% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEF and CMDT have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMDT.
CMDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.52% for XDEF.
XDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while CMDT is Commodities. XDEF tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while CMDT tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDEF and 0.65% for CMDT.
Find the right allocation for XDEF and CMDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer