XDEC vs. NVDO
XDEC (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. XDEC is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
XDEC vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEC achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.
XDEC
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 12.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEC vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XDEC FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December | 4.43% | 3.41% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 18.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEC and NVDO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEC vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
XDEC
NVDO
XDEC vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEC | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.12 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEC | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 1.30 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
XDEC vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEC drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEC and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEC | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -16.25% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -2.68% | +2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -4.99% | +3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | — | — |
Volatility
XDEC vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEC | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76% | 31.93% | -27.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 31.93% | -23.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 31.93% | -23.46% |
XDEC vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDEC vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
XDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 14.02% | 16.66% |
XDEC FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEC and NVDO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XDEC.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for XDEC.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XDEC and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for XDEC and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer