XDEC vs. FDND

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XDEC (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December) and FDND (FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEC is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust - Benchmark TR Gross, while FDND is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by FT Vest. XDEC is passively managed, while FDND is actively managed. Over the past year, XDEC returned 12.74% vs 9.82% for FDND. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FDND.

Performance

XDEC vs. FDND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDEC having a 4.61% return and FDND slightly lower at 4.50%.

XDEC

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 12.74%
• 3Y*: 10.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDND

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 6.42%
• YTD: 4.50%
• 6M: 3.71%
• 1Y: 9.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEC vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XDEC FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December	4.61%	9.71%	5.88%
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF	4.50%	9.69%	15.85%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEC and FDND is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024	0.63

The correlation between XDEC and FDND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XDEC vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEC

XDEC Risk / Return Rank: 82
XDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
XDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
XDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FDND

FDND Risk / Return Rank: 16
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEC vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDEC	FDND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	0.54	+2.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	0.84	+3.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.10	+0.50
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	0.52	+2.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.15	1.27	+17.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDEC vs. FDND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the FDND Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEC and FDND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDEC	FDND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	0.54	+2.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.65	+0.32

Drawdowns

XDEC vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEC drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEC and FDND.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDEC	FDND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.75%	-24.12%	+12.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.91%	-20.49%	+16.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.29%	+2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-5.68%	+4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	8.39%	-7.72%

Volatility

XDEC vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) is 0.73%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that XDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDEC	FDND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	4.79%	-4.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.11%	13.92%	-9.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.76%	18.18%	-13.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.48%	21.38%	-12.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.48%	21.38%	-12.90%

XDEC vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDEC vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison

XDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF	7.82%	8.11%	5.51%
XDEC FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDEC and FDND in my portfolio?

XDEC and FDND have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XDEC or FDND?

FDND has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to XDEC (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDEC dropped -11.75% vs FDND's -24.12%.

Which ETF is better, XDEC or FDND?

On 1-year performance, XDEC leads with 12.74% vs 9.82% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XDEC has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XDEC or FDND?

Over the 1-year period, XDEC has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDEC or FDND?

FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XDEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDEC or FDND?

FDND has the higher dividend yield at 7.82%, compared with 0.00% for XDEC.

What is the main difference between XDEC and FDND?

XDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FDND is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XDEC and 0.75% for FDND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.