XDAT vs. TRUT
XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
XDAT vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than TRUT's 25.30% return.
XDAT
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- 10.82%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- 1Y
- -1.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.26%
- 10Y*
- —
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDAT vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.92% | 0.44% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDAT and TRUT is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAT vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
XDAT
TRUT
XDAT vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDAT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDAT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 2.39 | -2.36 |
Drawdowns
XDAT vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -18.55% | -36.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.57% | -1.46% | -14.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.91% | -5.17% | -20.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.78% | — | — |
Volatility
XDAT vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.56% | 21.53% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.45% | 21.53% | +7.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.43% | 21.53% | +7.90% |
XDAT vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDAT vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDAT and TRUT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.
TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for XDAT and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer