XDAT vs. PDBC
XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDAT returned -2.54%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
XDAT vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a -7.81% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 22.11% return.
XDAT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- -7.81%
- 6M
- -9.60%
- 1Y
- -9.59%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- -2.54%
- 10Y*
- —
PDBC
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -11.10%
- YTD
- 22.11%
- 6M
- 20.75%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
XDAT vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | -7.81% | 1.87% | 16.54% | 45.77% | -45.71% | 9.61% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 22.11% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 35.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDAT and PDBC is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2021 | 0.11 |
The correlation between XDAT and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAT vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
XDAT
PDBC
XDAT vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDAT | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.24 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 1.76 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 7.71 | -8.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDAT vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAT | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -49.52% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -14.44% | -15.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -14.44% | -15.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.87% | -27.63% | -27.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.87% | -14.44% | -8.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.85% | -23.14% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.17% | 3.31% | +10.86% |
Volatility
XDAT vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 10.70% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 4.42%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAT | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.70% | 4.42% | +6.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.11% | 16.20% | +3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.35% | 18.73% | +5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.56% | 19.15% | +10.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.43% | 17.77% | +11.66% |
XDAT vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDAT vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.14% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDAT and PDBC have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XDAT has higher volatility (10.70%) compared to PDBC (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 5-year performance, PDBC leads with 9.92% vs -2.54% for XDAT. On fees, XDAT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PDBC has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 9.92% return vs -2.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDAT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.
XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDAT and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer