XDAT vs. PDBC
XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDAT returned -0.62%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
XDAT vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 28.91% return.
XDAT
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- -3.13%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- —
PDBC
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 23.23%
- YTD
- 28.91%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
XDAT vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | -0.59% | 1.87% | 16.54% | 45.77% | -45.71% | 9.61% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 28.91% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 35.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDAT and PDBC is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2021 | 0.11 |
The correlation between XDAT and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAT vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
XDAT
PDBC
XDAT vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDAT | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.30 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 2.02 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 7.05 | -7.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDAT vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAT | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -49.52% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -16.55% | -13.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -16.55% | -13.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.87% | -27.63% | -27.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.83% | -9.68% | -7.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.78% | -23.10% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 4.72% | +9.79% |
Volatility
XDAT vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 6.27%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAT | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 6.27% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.64% | 16.79% | +3.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.63% | 18.88% | +5.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.64% | 19.24% | +10.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.39% | 17.77% | +11.62% |
XDAT vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDAT vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.98% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDAT and PDBC have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XDAT has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to PDBC (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 5-year performance, PDBC leads with 11.15% vs -0.62% for XDAT. On fees, XDAT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PDBC has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 11.15% return vs -0.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDAT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.
XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDAT and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer