XDAT vs. GGTL

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and GGTL (Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDAT returned 8.74%/yr vs 21.17%/yr for GGTL. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GGTL.

Performance

XDAT vs. GGTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a -5.68% return, which is significantly lower than GGTL's 24.51% return.

XDAT

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: -5.68%
• 6M: -4.38%
• 1Y: -7.72%
• 3Y*: 8.74%
• 5Y*: -1.38%
• 10Y*: —

GGTL

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 7.52%
• YTD: 24.51%
• 6M: 27.10%
• 1Y: 41.79%
• 3Y*: 21.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDAT vs. GGTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	-5.68%	1.87%	16.54%	45.77%	-42.21%
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF	24.51%	19.78%	11.07%	18.17%	-16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XDAT and GGTL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2022	0.68

The correlation between XDAT and GGTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDAT vs. GGTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDAT	GGTL
Technology	59.4%	54.3%
Communication Services	32.0%	3.1%
Real Estate	4.7%	-
Healthcare	2.6%	-
Financial Services	2.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.2%	1.0%
Industrials	0.2%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XDAT vs. GGTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDAT

XDAT Risk / Return Rank: 6
XDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
XDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
XDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
XDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
XDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 7

GGTL

GGTL Risk / Return Rank: 79
GGTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
GGTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
GGTL Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GGTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GGTL Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDAT vs. GGTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDAT	GGTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	2.26	-2.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.29	2.99	-3.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.41	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	4.57	-4.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	15.66	-16.21

XDAT vs. GGTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the GGTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDAT and GGTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XDAT vs. GGTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than GGTL's maximum drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and GGTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDAT	GGTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.87%	-23.65%	-31.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.56%	-9.20%	-20.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.56%	-21.46%	-8.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.09%	-3.46%	-17.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.85%	-7.41%	-18.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.06%	2.68%	+11.38%

Volatility

XDAT vs. GGTL - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) at 9.91%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDAT	GGTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.49%	9.91%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.13%	15.89%	+4.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.29%	18.63%	+5.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.54%	18.01%	+11.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.45%	18.01%	+11.44%

XDAT vs. GGTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GGTL's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDAT vs. GGTL - Dividend Comparison

XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF	0.84%	1.04%	0.75%	0.84%	0.78%
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDAT and GGTL in my portfolio?

XDAT and GGTL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XDAT or GGTL?

XDAT has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to GGTL (9.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs GGTL's -23.65%.

Which ETF is better, XDAT or GGTL?

On 3-year performance, GGTL leads with 21.17% vs 8.74% for XDAT. On fees, XDAT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GGTL has been the lower-risk option at 9.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XDAT or GGTL?

Over the 3-year period, GGTL has performed better with a 21.17% return vs 8.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDAT or GGTL?

XDAT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDAT or GGTL?

GGTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.

What is the main difference between XDAT and GGTL?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.90% for GGTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.