XCX6.L vs. XGSI.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L).
XCX6.L and XGSI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCX6.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 24, 2010. XGSI.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2017. Both XCX6.L and XGSI.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XCX6.L vs. XGSI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCX6.L vs. XGSI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCX6.L Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C | -6.07% | 22.42% | 20.57% | -17.10% | -13.36% | -21.25% | 25.03% | 17.56% | -14.28% | 26.79% |
XGSI.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged | 1.29% | -3.42% | 3.01% | 0.55% | -3.00% | -1.56% | 2.75% | 3.35% | 8.32% | -4.45% |
Different Trading Currencies
XCX6.L is traded in GBp, while XGSI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XGSI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCX6.L achieves a -6.07% return, which is significantly lower than XGSI.L's 1.29% return.
XCX6.L
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- -6.07%
- 6M
- -13.00%
- 1Y
- 1.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- -4.79%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
XGSI.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- -0.22%
- 3Y*
- 0.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.18%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCX6.L vs. XGSI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCX6.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XGSI.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XCX6.L vs. XGSI.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCX6.L
XGSI.L
XCX6.L vs. XGSI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCX6.L | XGSI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.07 | -0.03 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.24 | 0.01 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.00 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.06 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | 0.09 | +0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCX6.L | XGSI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | -0.03 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.02 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.07 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCX6.L and XGSI.L is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XCX6.L vs. XGSI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCX6.L nor XGSI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XCX6.L vs. XGSI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCX6.L drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, which is greater than XGSI.L's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX6.L and XGSI.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCX6.L | XGSI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.08% | -17.29% | -39.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.43% | -2.64% | -13.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.24% | -16.39% | -33.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.06% | -6.48% | -26.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.78% | -5.67% | -15.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.48% | 0.93% | +5.55% |
Volatility
XCX6.L vs. XGSI.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) at 2.67%. This indicates that XCX6.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGSI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCX6.L | XGSI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 2.67% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.26% | 5.23% | +8.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.59% | 7.70% | +12.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.72% | 9.06% | +18.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.24% | 9.32% | +15.92% |