XCV.TO vs. HAL.TO
XCV.TO (iShares Canadian Value Index ETF) and HAL.TO (Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. XCV.TO is passively managed, while HAL.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCV.TO returned 13.20%/yr vs 11.69%/yr for HAL.TO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCV.TO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for HAL.TO.
Performance
XCV.TO vs. HAL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCV.TO achieves a 19.17% return, which is significantly higher than HAL.TO's 17.28% return. Over the past 10 years, XCV.TO has outperformed HAL.TO with an annualized return of 13.20%, while HAL.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.69% annualized return.
XCV.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 19.17%
- 6M
- 19.26%
- 1Y
- 44.26%
- 3Y*
- 27.30%
- 5Y*
- 17.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
HAL.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 20.97%
- 1Y
- 42.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
XCV.TO vs. HAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCV.TO iShares Canadian Value Index ETF | 19.17% | 32.17% | 21.26% | 9.47% | 1.87% | 32.71% | -2.56% | 18.02% | -11.15% | 8.75% |
HAL.TO Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF | 17.28% | 24.60% | 21.69% | -0.73% | 3.43% | 21.17% | -2.64% | 25.04% | -6.22% | 7.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCV.TO and HAL.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XCV.TO and HAL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCV.TO vs. HAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XCV.TO
HAL.TO
XCV.TO vs. HAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) and Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCV.TO | HAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.03 | 1.93 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.53 | 8.26 | +3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 43.47 | 37.67 | +5.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCV.TO | HAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.97 | 4.46 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.39 | 1.21 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.79 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.79 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
XCV.TO vs. HAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCV.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.49%, which is greater than HAL.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCV.TO and HAL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCV.TO | HAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.49% | -39.70% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.86% | -5.15% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.71% | -12.44% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.08% | -16.43% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.18% | -39.70% | -1.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | 0.00% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -4.19% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 1.13% | -0.11% |
Volatility
XCV.TO vs. HAL.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) at 2.48%. This indicates that XCV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCV.TO | HAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 2.48% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.65% | 7.85% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.96% | 9.53% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.87% | 12.36% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 14.85% | +0.69% |
XCV.TO vs. HAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCV.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than HAL.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCV.TO vs. HAL.TO - Dividend Comparison
XCV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than HAL.TO's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL.TO Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF | 1.97% | 2.37% | 2.79% | 3.60% | 4.84% | 2.99% | 3.56% | 2.96% | 3.43% | 3.17% | 2.84% | 3.19% |
XCV.TO iShares Canadian Value Index ETF | 2.29% | 2.71% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.18% | 2.11% | 3.35% | 3.06% | 3.13% | 2.40% | 2.50% | 3.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCV.TO and HAL.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCV.TO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCV.TO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for HAL.TO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for XCV.TO and 0.67% for HAL.TO.
Find the right allocation for XCV.TO and HAL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer