HAL.TO vs. CASH.TO
HAL.TO (Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAL.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAL.TO returned 21.26%/yr vs 3.62%/yr for CASH.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HAL.TO charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for CASH.TO.
Performance
HAL.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAL.TO achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's 0.83% return.
HAL.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 20.97%
- 1Y
- 42.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 2.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAL.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL.TO Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF | 17.28% | 24.60% | 21.69% | -0.73% | 3.43% | -0.38% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 0.83% | 2.45% | 4.53% | 5.11% | 2.39% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAL.TO and CASH.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAL.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HAL.TO
CASH.TO
HAL.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAL.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -26.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.93 | 7.47 | -5.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.26 | 111.49 | -103.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.67 | 468.24 | -430.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAL.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46 | 10.33 | -5.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 5.52 | -4.73 |
Drawdowns
HAL.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.70%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL.TO and CASH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAL.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.70% | -0.80% | -38.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.15% | -0.02% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.44% | -0.06% | -12.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -0.00% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 0.00% | +1.13% |
Volatility
HAL.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that HAL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAL.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 0.06% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.85% | 0.13% | +7.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.53% | 0.22% | +9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 0.61% | +11.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 0.61% | +14.24% |
HAL.TO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAL.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAL.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
HAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than CASH.TO's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.06% | 2.30% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAL.TO Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF | 1.97% | 2.37% | 2.79% | 3.60% | 4.84% | 2.99% | 3.56% | 2.96% | 3.43% | 3.17% | 2.84% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAL.TO and CASH.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for HAL.TO.
HAL.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CASH.TO is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for HAL.TO and 0.11% for CASH.TO.
Find the right allocation for HAL.TO and CASH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer