XCTE.L vs. KROP.L
XCTE.L (Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and KROP.L (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Technology Equities funds - XCTE.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while KROP.L tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCTE.L returned 8.68%/yr vs -1.55%/yr for KROP.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCTE.L charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.L.
Performance
XCTE.L vs. KROP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCTE.L achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than KROP.L's 14.38% return.
XCTE.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- 6M
- -5.89%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROP.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 10.47%
- 3Y*
- -1.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCTE.L vs. KROP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCTE.L Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C | -1.68% | 35.15% | 13.83% | -15.21% | -0.32% |
KROP.L Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.38% | 7.62% | -8.33% | -22.51% | -27.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCTE.L and KROP.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2022 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCTE.L vs. KROP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCTE.L
KROP.L
XCTE.L vs. KROP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCTE.L | KROP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 0.98 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.72 | 2.00 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCTE.L vs. KROP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCTE.L drawdown since its inception was -46.14%, smaller than the maximum KROP.L drawdown of -52.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCTE.L and KROP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCTE.L | KROP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.14% | -52.04% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.75% | -10.68% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.95% | -27.32% | -5.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.27% | -37.92% | +26.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.43% | -36.93% | +15.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.41% | 5.22% | +3.19% |
Volatility
XCTE.L vs. KROP.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L) at 4.12%. This indicates that XCTE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCTE.L | KROP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 4.12% | +3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.67% | 12.94% | +4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.11% | 16.50% | +7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.54% | 21.23% | +9.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.54% | 21.23% | +9.31% |
XCTE.L vs. KROP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCTE.L has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCTE.L vs. KROP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCTE.L nor KROP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCTE.L and KROP.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCTE.L is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCTE.L is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.L.
XCTE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while KROP.L tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for XCTE.L and 0.50% for KROP.L.
Find the right allocation for XCTE.L and KROP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer