XCTE.L vs. ECAR.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XCTE.L (Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and ECAR.L (iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from DWS and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCTE.L returned 13.19%/yr vs 27.91%/yr for ECAR.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCTE.L charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ECAR.L.

Performance

XCTE.L vs. ECAR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCTE.L achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than ECAR.L's 60.95% return.

XCTE.L

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 3.47%
• YTD: 6.34%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 31.65%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ECAR.L

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 23.25%
• YTD: 60.95%
• 6M: 64.41%
• 1Y: 97.69%
• 3Y*: 27.91%
• 5Y*: 12.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCTE.L vs. ECAR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XCTE.L Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C	6.34%	35.19%	13.80%	-15.21%	-18.22%
ECAR.L iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	60.95%	24.33%	-0.93%	27.09%	1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between XCTE.L and ECAR.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.55

The correlation between XCTE.L and ECAR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCTE.L vs. ECAR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XCTE.L	ECAR.L
Technology	30.8%	66.1%
Consumer Cyclical	22.7%	28.6%
Communication Services	13.9%	-
Industrials	11.4%	4.8%
Basic Materials	10.0%	0.2%
Utilities	4.6%	-
Healthcare	3.2%	-
Financial Services	2.0%	-
Real Estate	1.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	-
Energy	0.3%	-

Return for Risk

XCTE.L vs. ECAR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCTE.L

XCTE.L Risk / Return Rank: 37
XCTE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
XCTE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
XCTE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 37
XCTE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XCTE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

ECAR.L

ECAR.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ECAR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ECAR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ECAR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ECAR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCTE.L vs. ECAR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCTE.L	ECAR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	3.76	-2.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	4.84	-2.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.59	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	7.46	-5.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.09	23.11	-19.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCTE.L vs. ECAR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCTE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCTE.L and ECAR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCTE.L	ECAR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	3.76	-2.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.63	-0.52

Drawdowns

XCTE.L vs. ECAR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCTE.L drawdown since its inception was -42.79%, roughly equal to the maximum ECAR.L drawdown of -42.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCTE.L and ECAR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCTE.L	ECAR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.79%	-42.77%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.77%	-13.03%	-3.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.93%	-29.34%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.03%	0.00%	-4.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.16%	-11.56%	-7.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.72%	4.21%	+3.51%

Volatility

XCTE.L vs. ECAR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L) is 8.65%, while iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a volatility of 12.35%. This indicates that XCTE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCTE.L	ECAR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.65%	12.35%	-3.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.14%	21.23%	-5.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.90%	25.88%	-2.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.33%	24.71%	+4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.33%	25.68%	+3.65%

XCTE.L vs. ECAR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCTE.L has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than ECAR.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCTE.L vs. ECAR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XCTE.L nor ECAR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCTE.L and ECAR.L in my portfolio?

XCTE.L and ECAR.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XCTE.L or ECAR.L?

On fees, ECAR.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCTE.L or ECAR.L?

ECAR.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for XCTE.L.

What is the main difference between XCTE.L and ECAR.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for XCTE.L and 0.40% for ECAR.L.