KROP.L vs. USPY.L
KROP.L (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and USPY.L (L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Technology Equities funds - KROP.L tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation v2 Index while USPY.L tracks the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security UCITS Net Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROP.L returned -1.55%/yr vs 28.12%/yr for USPY.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KROP.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for USPY.L.
Performance
KROP.L vs. USPY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROP.L achieves a 14.38% return, which is significantly lower than USPY.L's 43.57% return.
KROP.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 10.47%
- 3Y*
- -1.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USPY.L
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 46.46%
- YTD
- 43.57%
- 1Y
- 40.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- 17.00%
KROP.L vs. USPY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP.L Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.38% | 7.62% | -8.33% | -22.51% | -24.21% |
USPY.L L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 43.57% | 7.58% | 17.82% | 42.25% | -26.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROP.L and USPY.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KROP.L and USPY.L has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROP.L vs. USPY.L — Risk / Return Rank
KROP.L
USPY.L
KROP.L vs. USPY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L) and L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (USPY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KROP.L | USPY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.27 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 2.22 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | 5.76 | -3.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KROP.L vs. USPY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROP.L drawdown since its inception was -52.04%, which is greater than USPY.L's maximum drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP.L and USPY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROP.L | USPY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.04% | -39.35% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -18.08% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.32% | -27.03% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.92% | -4.82% | -33.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -9.82% | -27.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | 6.99% | -1.77% |
Volatility
KROP.L vs. USPY.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L) is 4.12%, while L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (USPY.L) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that KROP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USPY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROP.L | USPY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 11.35% | -7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | 25.32% | -12.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 28.28% | -11.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 26.09% | -4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 23.57% | -2.34% |
KROP.L vs. USPY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
KROP.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than USPY.L's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
KROP.L vs. USPY.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither KROP.L nor USPY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KROP.L and USPY.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KROP.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KROP.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for USPY.L.
KROP.L tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation v2 Index, while USPY.L tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security UCITS Net Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP.L and 0.69% for USPY.L.
Find the right allocation for KROP.L and USPY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer