KROP.L vs. MKUW.L
KROP.L (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc) and MKUW.L (Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - KROP.L tracks the Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc while MKUW.L tracks the Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROP.L returned -1.04%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for MKUW.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
KROP.L vs. MKUW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROP.L achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly higher than MKUW.L's 0.89% return.
KROP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 9.77%
- 3Y*
- -1.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MKUW.L
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -1.83%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- —
KROP.L vs. MKUW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP.L Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc | 14.16% | 7.62% | -8.33% | -22.51% | -24.21% |
MKUW.L Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.89% | 25.35% | 9.15% | -8.87% | 1.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROP.L and MKUW.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022 | 0.18 |
The correlation between KROP.L and MKUW.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROP.L vs. MKUW.L — Risk / Return Rank
KROP.L
MKUW.L
KROP.L vs. MKUW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc (KROP.L) and Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KROP.L | MKUW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.10 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 0.70 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 1.63 | +0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KROP.L vs. MKUW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROP.L drawdown since its inception was -52.04%, which is greater than MKUW.L's maximum drawdown of -37.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP.L and MKUW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROP.L | MKUW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.04% | -37.76% | -14.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -7.47% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.32% | -14.16% | -13.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.04% | -2.89% | -35.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -9.42% | -27.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.21% | 3.24% | +1.97% |
Volatility
KROP.L vs. MKUW.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc (KROP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L) at 2.12%. This indicates that KROP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKUW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROP.L | MKUW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 2.12% | +2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 8.09% | +4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.56% | 10.37% | +6.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 12.77% | +8.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 16.50% | +4.75% |
KROP.L vs. MKUW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both KROP.L and MKUW.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
KROP.L vs. MKUW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither KROP.L nor MKUW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KROP.L and MKUW.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KROP.L and MKUW.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
KROP.L tracks Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc, while MKUW.L tracks Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco.
Find the right allocation for KROP.L and MKUW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer