XCTE.DE vs. ES6Y.DE
XCTE.DE (Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and ES6Y.DE (L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds - XCTE.DE tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while ES6Y.DE tracks the Solactive Emerging Cyber Security. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCTE.DE returned 10.51%/yr vs 33.66%/yr for ES6Y.DE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCTE.DE charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ES6Y.DE.
Performance
XCTE.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCTE.DE achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly lower than ES6Y.DE's 59.99% return.
XCTE.DE
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ES6Y.DE
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- 59.99%
- 6M
- 53.64%
- 1Y
- 57.05%
- 3Y*
- 33.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCTE.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCTE.DE Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 5.61% | 19.05% | 22.69% | -18.15% | -14.41% |
ES6Y.DE L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 59.99% | -9.21% | 34.05% | 51.62% | -18.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCTE.DE and ES6Y.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCTE.DE vs. ES6Y.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCTE.DE
ES6Y.DE
XCTE.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE) and L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCTE.DE | ES6Y.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.36 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 3.77 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | 9.25 | -7.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCTE.DE | ES6Y.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.18 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.99 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
XCTE.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCTE.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.80%, which is greater than ES6Y.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCTE.DE and ES6Y.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCTE.DE | ES6Y.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.80% | -34.72% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.30% | -15.05% | -8.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.31% | -34.72% | +3.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.95% | -1.36% | -11.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -9.52% | -16.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.53% | 6.15% | +7.38% |
Volatility
XCTE.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE) is 7.28%, while L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE) has a volatility of 10.01%. This indicates that XCTE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ES6Y.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCTE.DE | ES6Y.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 10.01% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.06% | 20.66% | -5.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.97% | 26.06% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.37% | 26.64% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.37% | 26.64% | +3.73% |
XCTE.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCTE.DE has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than ES6Y.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCTE.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCTE.DE nor ES6Y.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCTE.DE and ES6Y.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCTE.DE is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCTE.DE is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ES6Y.DE.
XCTE.DE tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while ES6Y.DE tracks Solactive Emerging Cyber Security. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for XCTE.DE and 0.49% for ES6Y.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCTE.DE and ES6Y.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer