ES6Y.DE vs. SETM
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM).
ES6Y.DE and SETM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ES6Y.DE is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the Solactive Emerging Cyber Security. It was launched on Sep 1, 2022. SETM is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 1, 2023. Both ES6Y.DE and SETM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ES6Y.DE vs. SETM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ES6Y.DE vs. SETM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ES6Y.DE L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 6.28% | -9.21% | 34.05% | 31.46% |
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 18.22% | 72.10% | -7.52% | -12.04% |
Different Trading Currencies
ES6Y.DE is traded in EUR, while SETM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SETM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ES6Y.DE achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly lower than SETM's 18.22% return.
ES6Y.DE
- 1D
- 4.95%
- 1M
- 7.00%
- YTD
- 6.28%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETM
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- 18.22%
- 6M
- 34.81%
- 1Y
- 127.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ES6Y.DE vs. SETM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ES6Y.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SETM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ES6Y.DE vs. SETM — Risk / Return Rank
ES6Y.DE
SETM
ES6Y.DE vs. SETM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ES6Y.DE | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | 2.83 | -2.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 3.06 | -2.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.42 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 5.21 | -4.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 16.93 | -14.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ES6Y.DE | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 2.83 | -2.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.50 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between ES6Y.DE and SETM is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ES6Y.DE vs. SETM - Dividend Comparison
ES6Y.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ES6Y.DE L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 1.35% | 1.56% | 2.07% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
ES6Y.DE vs. SETM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ES6Y.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, smaller than the maximum SETM drawdown of -43.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES6Y.DE and SETM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ES6Y.DE | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.72% | -42.81% | +8.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -25.85% | +9.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.29% | -15.39% | +3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -14.59% | +4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 7.76% | -1.54% |
Volatility
ES6Y.DE vs. SETM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE) is 8.84%, while Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) has a volatility of 15.75%. This indicates that ES6Y.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ES6Y.DE | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 15.75% | -6.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.64% | 35.89% | -17.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.70% | 45.40% | -17.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 34.98% | -8.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 34.98% | -8.86% |