XCTE.DE vs. C300.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L).
XCTE.DE and C300.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCTE.DE is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Mar 31, 2022. C300.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P China A 300 Index. It was launched on May 5, 2022. Both XCTE.DE and C300.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XCTE.DE vs. C300.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCTE.DE vs. C300.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCTE.DE Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C | -5.32% | 19.05% | 22.69% | -18.15% | 4.09% |
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 3.57% | 17.90% | 22.36% | -14.45% | 0.33% |
Different Trading Currencies
XCTE.DE is traded in EUR, while C300.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the C300.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCTE.DE achieves a -5.32% return, which is significantly lower than C300.L's 3.57% return.
XCTE.DE
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- YTD
- -5.32%
- 6M
- -12.73%
- 1Y
- 5.76%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
C300.L
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 26.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCTE.DE vs. C300.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCTE.DE has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than C300.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XCTE.DE vs. C300.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCTE.DE
C300.L
XCTE.DE vs. C300.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCTE.DE | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.18 | 1.41 | -1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.87 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.27 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 2.99 | -2.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 9.29 | -8.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCTE.DE | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 1.41 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.31 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCTE.DE and C300.L is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XCTE.DE vs. C300.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCTE.DE nor C300.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XCTE.DE vs. C300.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCTE.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.80%, which is greater than C300.L's maximum drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCTE.DE and C300.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCTE.DE | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.80% | -31.77% | -17.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | -11.35% | -11.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.95% | -4.34% | -17.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.16% | -14.62% | -11.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.16% | 2.34% | +9.82% |
Volatility
XCTE.DE vs. C300.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE) is 6.10%, while Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that XCTE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than C300.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCTE.DE | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 6.72% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.64% | 12.70% | +12.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.51% | 18.35% | +13.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 21.37% | +9.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 21.37% | +9.23% |