PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ES6Y.DE vs. CBUV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ES6Y.DE vs. CBUV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE) and iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ES6Y.DE vs. CBUV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ES6Y.DE
L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
7.23%-9.21%34.05%48.49%
CBUV.DE
iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-9.42%8.91%30.32%51.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ES6Y.DE achieves a 7.23% return, which is significantly higher than CBUV.DE's -9.42% return.


ES6Y.DE

1D
0.89%
1M
7.46%
YTD
7.23%
6M
0.81%
1Y
13.76%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
10Y*

CBUV.DE

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-9.42%
6M
-12.50%
1Y
8.47%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ES6Y.DE vs. CBUV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ES6Y.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUV.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ES6Y.DE vs. CBUV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ES6Y.DE
ES6Y.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ES6Y.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES6Y.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES6Y.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ES6Y.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES6Y.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUV.DE
CBUV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CBUV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ES6Y.DE vs. CBUV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE) and iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ES6Y.DECBUV.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

0.37

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.85

0.67

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.09

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

0.81

+0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.76

2.13

+1.63

ES6Y.DE vs. CBUV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ES6Y.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the CBUV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ES6Y.DE and CBUV.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ES6Y.DECBUV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.37

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.11

-0.56

Correlation

The correlation between ES6Y.DE and CBUV.DE is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ES6Y.DE vs. CBUV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ES6Y.DE nor CBUV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ES6Y.DE vs. CBUV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ES6Y.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than CBUV.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES6Y.DE and CBUV.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ES6Y.DECBUV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.72%

-27.66%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.05%

-20.30%

+5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.51%

-17.15%

+5.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-4.83%

-5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.15%

7.68%

-1.53%

Volatility

ES6Y.DE vs. CBUV.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.78% compared to iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) at 5.45%. This indicates that ES6Y.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ES6Y.DECBUV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.78%

5.45%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.66%

14.12%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.65%

22.83%

+4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.11%

20.40%

+5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.11%

20.40%

+5.71%