PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCS7.DE vs. 9W1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCS7.DE vs. 9W1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with XCS7.DE at -6.89% and 9W1.DE at -6.89%.


XCS7.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
-6.89%
6M
-8.38%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
10Y*

9W1.DE

1D
-0.47%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
-6.89%
6M
-8.49%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCS7.DE vs. 9W1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XCS7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D
-6.89%16.53%27.49%-14.73%4.09%
9W1.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
-6.89%16.44%21.98%-17.19%-2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XCS7.DE and 9W1.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022

0.97

The correlation between XCS7.DE and 9W1.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCS7.DE vs. 9W1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCS7.DE
XCS7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XCS7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

9W1.DE
9W1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
9W1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
9W1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
9W1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
9W1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
9W1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCS7.DE vs. 9W1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCS7.DE9W1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.04

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

0.13

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

0.27

+0.07

XCS7.DE vs. 9W1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCS7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is comparable to the 9W1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCS7.DE and 9W1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCS7.DE9W1.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

0.12

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

-0.11

+0.31

Drawdowns

XCS7.DE vs. 9W1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCS7.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.62%, smaller than the maximum 9W1.DE drawdown of -50.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS7.DE and 9W1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCS7.DE9W1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.62%

-50.36%

+13.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.01%

-17.01%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.53%

-31.53%

+7.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.97%

-25.23%

+10.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.59%

-27.28%

+11.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.18%

8.37%

-0.19%

Volatility

XCS7.DE vs. 9W1.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE) have volatilities of 7.33% and 7.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCS7.DE9W1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

7.19%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.19%

13.30%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.48%

18.92%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.65%

28.69%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.65%

28.69%

-3.04%

XCS7.DE vs. 9W1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCS7.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than 9W1.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCS7.DE vs. 9W1.DE - Dividend Comparison

XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while 9W1.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
9W1.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCS7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D
2.11%2.35%2.05%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XCS7.DE and 9W1.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XCS7.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCS7.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for 9W1.DE.

XCS7.DE tracks MSCI China, while 9W1.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XCS7.DE and 0.31% for 9W1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCS7.DE and 9W1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer