XCOR vs. QLC
XCOR (Fundx ETF) and QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XCOR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by FundX, while QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. XCOR is actively managed, while QLC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCOR returned 22.94%/yr vs 25.39%/yr for QLC. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCOR charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QLC.
Performance
XCOR vs. QLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCOR achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than QLC's 11.39% return.
XCOR
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 7.51%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 29.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- 25.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
XCOR vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCOR Fundx ETF | 13.43% | 12.50% | 29.57% | 14.34% | 7.11% |
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 11.39% | 23.26% | 26.71% | 26.02% | 4.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCOR and QLC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between XCOR and QLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
XCOR vs. QLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XCOR
QLC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
XCOR
QLC
Financial Services
XCOR
QLC
Communication Services
XCOR
QLC
Consumer Cyclical
XCOR
QLC
Healthcare
XCOR
QLC
Industrials
XCOR
QLC
Consumer Defensive
XCOR
QLC
Energy
XCOR
QLC
Utilities
XCOR
QLC
Basic Materials
XCOR
QLC
Real Estate
XCOR
QLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCOR vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank
XCOR
QLC
XCOR vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundx ETF (XCOR) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCOR | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.48 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.76 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 17.59 | -3.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCOR | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.69 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.80 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
XCOR vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCOR and QLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCOR | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.54% | -35.86% | +13.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.60% | -8.84% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.54% | -18.49% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -0.74% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -4.54% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.89% | +0.28% |
Volatility
XCOR vs. QLC - Volatility Comparison
Fundx ETF (XCOR) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) at 2.94%. This indicates that XCOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCOR | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 2.94% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.17% | 9.51% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.84% | 12.38% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 16.82% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 18.42% | -1.37% |
XCOR vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCOR has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCOR vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison
XCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than QLC's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.26% | 1.46% | 0.96% | 1.40% | 1.91% | 1.82% | 1.29% | 1.80% | 0.64% |
XCOR Fundx ETF | 0.38% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.95% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, XCOR and QLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XCOR has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to QLC (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCOR dropped -22.54% vs QLC's -35.86%.
On 3-year performance, QLC leads with 25.39% vs 22.94% for XCOR. On fees, QLC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, QLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QLC has performed better with a 25.39% return vs 22.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for XCOR.
QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.38% for XCOR.
XCOR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: FundX and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for XCOR and 0.25% for QLC.
QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XCOR and QLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer