XCOR vs. IQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XCOR (Fundx ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCOR returned 22.94%/yr vs 37.62%/yr for IQM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCOR charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.

Performance

XCOR vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundx ETF (XCOR) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCOR achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 40.18% return.

XCOR

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 7.51%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 14.00%
• 1Y: 29.47%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IQM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 11.94%
• YTD: 40.18%
• 6M: 38.57%
• 1Y: 75.07%
• 3Y*: 37.62%
• 5Y*: 22.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCOR vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XCOR Fundx ETF	13.43%	12.50%	29.57%	14.34%	7.11%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	40.18%	30.76%	31.03%	41.06%	9.82%

Correlation

The correlation between XCOR and IQM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022	0.85

The correlation between XCOR and IQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCOR vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XCOR	IQM
Technology	39.0%	65.9%
Financial Services	12.7%	-
Communication Services	12.2%	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	4.1%
Healthcare	6.1%	1.1%
Industrials	5.4%	19.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.8%	2.7%
Utilities	2.4%	3.3%
Basic Materials	2.1%	-
Real Estate	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

XCOR vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCOR

XCOR Risk / Return Rank: 69
XCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
XCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
XCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 69
XCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
XCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 73

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 78
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCOR vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundx ETF (XCOR) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCOR	IQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.67	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	3.11	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.43	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	5.13	-2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.62	16.79	-3.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCOR vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCOR and IQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCOR	IQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.67	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	0.96	+0.30

Drawdowns

XCOR vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCOR and IQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCOR	IQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.54%	-44.91%	+22.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.60%	-14.71%	+5.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.54%	-30.42%	+7.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-0.37%	-0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.12%	-12.25%	+9.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	4.49%	-2.32%

Volatility

XCOR vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fundx ETF (XCOR) is 3.78%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that XCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCOR	IQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	9.20%	-5.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.17%	22.92%	-12.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.84%	28.27%	-15.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.05%	28.91%	-11.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.05%	30.72%	-13.67%

XCOR vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCOR has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCOR vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

XCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%
XCOR Fundx ETF	0.38%	0.43%	0.00%	0.95%	2.52%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCOR and IQM in my portfolio?

XCOR and IQM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XCOR or IQM?

IQM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to XCOR (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCOR dropped -22.54% vs IQM's -44.91%.

Which ETF is better, XCOR or IQM?

On 3-year performance, IQM leads with 37.62% vs 22.94% for XCOR. On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XCOR or IQM?

Over the 3-year period, IQM has performed better with a 37.62% return vs 22.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCOR or IQM?

IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for XCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCOR or IQM?

XCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.

What is the main difference between XCOR and IQM?

They also come from different issuers: FundX and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for XCOR and 0.50% for IQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.