XCOR vs. GQGU
XCOR (Fundx ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XCOR returned 21.05% vs 5.18% for GQGU. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. XCOR charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
XCOR vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCOR achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 5.70% return.
XCOR
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- 21.05%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 5.70%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCOR vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XCOR Fundx ETF | 9.95% | 10.01% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 5.70% | -1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCOR and GQGU is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCOR vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
XCOR
GQGU
XCOR vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundx ETF (XCOR) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCOR | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.09 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 0.62 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | 1.50 | +7.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCOR vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCOR and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCOR | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.54% | -8.41% | -14.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.60% | -8.41% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -5.46% | +1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -2.90% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 3.46% | -1.01% |
Volatility
XCOR vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Fundx ETF (XCOR) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) at 4.50%. This indicates that XCOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCOR | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 4.50% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 8.53% | +3.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 10.73% | +3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 10.71% | +6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 10.71% | +6.56% |
XCOR vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCOR has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCOR vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
XCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than GQGU's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCOR Fundx ETF | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.95% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCOR and GQGU have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XCOR has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to GQGU (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCOR dropped -22.54% vs GQGU's -8.41%.
On 1-year performance, XCOR leads with 21.05% vs 5.18% for GQGU. On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, GQGU has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XCOR has performed better with a 21.05% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for XCOR.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.39% for XCOR.
They also come from different issuers: FundX and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for XCOR and 0.49% for GQGU.
XCOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XCOR and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer