XCMC.DE vs. LYPS.DE
XCMC.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and LYPS.DE (Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - XCMC.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while LYPS.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCMC.DE returned 11.29%/yr vs 19.02%/yr for LYPS.DE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCMC.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for LYPS.DE.
Performance
XCMC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCMC.DE achieves a 28.51% return, which is significantly higher than LYPS.DE's 11.42% return.
XCMC.DE
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 28.51%
- 6M
- 19.96%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LYPS.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 25.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
XCMC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 28.51% | -2.66% | 11.92% | -9.34% | 24.84% | -11.32% |
LYPS.DE Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 11.42% | 4.89% | 32.52% | 22.69% | -14.10% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCMC.DE and LYPS.DE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.18 |
The correlation between XCMC.DE and LYPS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCMC.DE vs. LYPS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCMC.DE
LYPS.DE
XCMC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCMC.DE | LYPS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 3.60 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 12.84 | -4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCMC.DE | LYPS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.21 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.98 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
XCMC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum LYPS.DE drawdown of -33.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCMC.DE and LYPS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCMC.DE | LYPS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -33.81% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -7.12% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.82% | -23.37% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -0.48% | -2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.68% | -4.01% | -8.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 2.00% | +1.45% |
Volatility
XCMC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that XCMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYPS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCMC.DE | LYPS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 2.63% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 7.58% | +7.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 11.58% | +5.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 15.21% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 16.10% | +1.23% |
XCMC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCMC.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than LYPS.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCMC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYPS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYPS.DE Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 0.90% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.04% | 2.11% | 1.09% | 1.54% | 1.63% | 1.93% | 1.75% | 1.88% | 2.02% |
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCMC.DE and LYPS.DE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYPS.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYPS.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XCMC.DE.
XCMC.DE is categorized as Commodities, while LYPS.DE is S&P 500. XCMC.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while LYPS.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XCMC.DE and 0.07% for LYPS.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCMC.DE and LYPS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer