PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPS.DE vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPS.DE vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LYPS.DE is traded in EUR, while DGRW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRW values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LYPS.DE having a 11.42% return and DGRW slightly lower at 11.12%. Over the past 10 years, LYPS.DE has outperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 15.17%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively lower 13.94% annualized return.


LYPS.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
5.20%
YTD
11.42%
6M
11.46%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
15.17%

DGRW

1D
0.57%
1M
4.87%
YTD
11.12%
6M
9.79%
1Y
19.79%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
13.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPS.DE vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
11.42%4.89%32.52%22.69%-14.10%40.92%7.06%34.95%-1.02%6.97%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
11.12%-1.14%24.71%15.10%-0.53%33.77%4.48%32.47%-0.94%11.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPS.DE and DGRW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013

0.59

The correlation between LYPS.DE and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPS.DE vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPS.DE
LYPS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPS.DE vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYPS.DEDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

3.23

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

12.78

+0.06

LYPS.DE vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPS.DE and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYPS.DEDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.91

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.94

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.82

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.84

+0.14

Drawdowns

LYPS.DE vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPS.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.81%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -31.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPS.DE and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPS.DEDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.81%

-31.38%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-6.16%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-20.78%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-20.78%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.81%

-31.38%

-2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-3.71%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.55%

+0.45%

Volatility

LYPS.DE vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.28%. This indicates that LYPS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPS.DEDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.28%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

7.64%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

10.40%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

14.23%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

16.97%

-0.87%

LYPS.DE vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPS.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYPS.DE vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

LYPS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than DGRW's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.90%1.00%1.21%1.04%2.11%1.09%1.54%1.63%1.93%1.75%1.88%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYPS.DE and DGRW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYPS.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYPS.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.

LYPS.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while DGRW is Dividend. LYPS.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LYPS.DE and 0.28% for DGRW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPS.DE and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer