XCMC.DE vs. ENTR.DE
XCMC.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Commodities funds - XCMC.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward while ENTR.DE tracks the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XCMC.DE returned 29.14% vs 37.69% for ENTR.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCMC.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ENTR.DE.
Performance
XCMC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCMC.DE achieves a 28.51% return, which is significantly higher than ENTR.DE's 12.78% return.
XCMC.DE
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 28.51%
- 6M
- 19.96%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENTR.DE
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 23.00%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCMC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 28.51% | -2.66% | 1.55% |
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 12.78% | 17.08% | -0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCMC.DE and ENTR.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XCMC.DE and ENTR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCMC.DE vs. ENTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCMC.DE
ENTR.DE
XCMC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCMC.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 3.86 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 13.56 | -5.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCMC.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.27 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.92 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
XCMC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than ENTR.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCMC.DE and ENTR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCMC.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -14.17% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -9.72% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -2.59% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.68% | -5.85% | -6.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 2.77% | +0.68% |
Volatility
XCMC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) at 4.62%. This indicates that XCMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENTR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCMC.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 4.62% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 13.78% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 16.50% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 15.02% | +2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 15.02% | +2.31% |
XCMC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCMC.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ENTR.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCMC.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCMC.DE nor ENTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCMC.DE and ENTR.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCMC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
XCMC.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XCMC.DE and 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCMC.DE and ENTR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer