ENTR.DE vs. BCFU.DE
ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - ENTR.DE tracks the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity while BCFU.DE tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ENTR.DE returned 37.69% vs 30.38% for BCFU.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENTR.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for BCFU.DE.
Performance
ENTR.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ENTR.DE is traded in EUR, while BCFU.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCFU.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENTR.DE achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly lower than BCFU.DE's 19.04% return.
ENTR.DE
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 23.00%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCFU.DE
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 19.04%
- 6M
- 20.49%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
ENTR.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 12.78% | 17.08% | -0.06% |
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 19.04% | 5.83% | 1.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENTR.DE and BCFU.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between ENTR.DE and BCFU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENTR.DE vs. BCFU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ENTR.DE
BCFU.DE
ENTR.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENTR.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.35 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 4.30 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.56 | 9.99 | +3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENTR.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.98 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.62 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
ENTR.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.17%, smaller than the maximum BCFU.DE drawdown of -25.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENTR.DE and BCFU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENTR.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.17% | -25.15% | +10.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -7.03% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -3.51% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -11.04% | +5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 3.03% | -0.26% |
Volatility
ENTR.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Volatility Comparison
L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENTR.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 4.47% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.78% | 12.82% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 15.29% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 16.95% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 15.33% | -0.31% |
ENTR.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENTR.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BCFU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENTR.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENTR.DE nor BCFU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENTR.DE and BCFU.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCFU.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCFU.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity, while BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ENTR.DE and 0.34% for BCFU.DE.
Find the right allocation for ENTR.DE and BCFU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer