PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCLR vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCLR vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCLR achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -2.28% return.


XCLR

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.04%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.16%
1Y
13.37%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-2.39%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
-2.28%
6M
1.71%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCLR vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
2.37%10.25%20.67%6.03%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-2.28%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XCLR and SHLD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023

0.45

XCLR vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCLR
SHLD

Technology

35.6%
11.8%

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%
88.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

XCLR
35.6%
SHLD
11.8%

Financial Services

XCLR
11.8%
SHLD

-

Communication Services

XCLR
11.2%
SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

XCLR
10.1%
SHLD

-

Healthcare

XCLR
8.5%
SHLD

-

Industrials

XCLR
8.3%
SHLD
88.2%

Consumer Defensive

XCLR
4.9%
SHLD

-

Energy

XCLR
3.5%
SHLD

-

Utilities

XCLR
2.4%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

XCLR
2.0%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

XCLR
1.8%
SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCLR vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCLR
XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCLR vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCLRSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.08

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

0.49

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

1.30

+5.22

XCLR vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCLR and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCLRSHLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

0.41

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

2.00

-1.27

Drawdowns

XCLR vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCLR drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCLR and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCLRSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-20.10%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-20.10%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-18.85%

+18.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-3.19%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

7.51%

-5.45%

Volatility

XCLR vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) is 0.61%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that XCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCLRSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

7.81%

-7.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.18%

19.35%

-13.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.58%

24.05%

-15.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.44%

21.13%

-10.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.44%

21.13%

-10.69%

XCLR vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCLR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCLR vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

XCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.85%, more than SHLD's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
12.85%13.15%18.76%1.40%1.01%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCLR and SHLD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to XCLR (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCLR dropped -14.63% vs SHLD's -20.10%.

On 1-year performance, XCLR leads with 13.37% vs 9.71% for SHLD. On fees, XCLR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XCLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XCLR has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XCLR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHLD.

XCLR has the higher dividend yield at 12.85%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.

XCLR is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. XCLR tracks Cboe S&P 500 3-Month Collar 95-110 Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XCLR and 0.50% for SHLD.

XCLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCLR and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer