PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCLR vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCLR vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCLR achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -7.27% return.


XCLR

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.15%
6M
1.75%
YTD
2.87%
1Y
10.15%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-0.61%
1M
-5.92%
6M
-22.32%
YTD
-7.27%
1Y
-0.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCLR vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
2.87%10.25%20.67%6.16%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-7.27%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XCLR and SHLD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.45

XCLR vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCLR
SHLD

Technology

39.0%
12.2%

Financial Services

11.1%

-

Communication Services

10.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%

-

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Industrials

7.8%
87.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Energy

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

XCLR
39.0%
SHLD
12.2%

Financial Services

XCLR
11.1%
SHLD

-

Communication Services

XCLR
10.6%
SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

XCLR
9.9%
SHLD

-

Healthcare

XCLR
8.3%
SHLD

-

Industrials

XCLR
7.8%
SHLD
87.8%

Consumer Defensive

XCLR
4.5%
SHLD

-

Energy

XCLR
3.2%
SHLD

-

Utilities

XCLR
2.1%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

XCLR
1.8%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

XCLR
1.7%
SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCLR vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCLR
XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCLR vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCLRSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.01

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

-0.03

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.93

-0.08

+5.01

XCLR vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCLR and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCLR vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCLR drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCLR and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCLRSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-25.40%

+10.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-25.40%

+17.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-22.99%

+22.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-3.90%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

10.30%

-8.24%

Volatility

XCLR vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) is 1.82%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that XCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCLRSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

8.28%

-6.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.96%

19.79%

-13.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.35%

25.12%

-16.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.35%

21.54%

-11.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.35%

21.54%

-11.19%

XCLR vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCLR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCLR vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

XCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.77%, more than SHLD's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.71%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
12.77%13.15%18.76%1.40%1.01%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCLR and SHLD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to XCLR (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCLR dropped -14.63% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, XCLR leads with 10.15% vs -0.87% for SHLD. On fees, XCLR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XCLR has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XCLR has performed better with a 10.15% return vs -0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XCLR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHLD.

XCLR has the higher dividend yield at 12.77%, compared with 0.71% for SHLD.

XCLR is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. XCLR tracks Cboe S&P 500 3-Month Collar 95-110 Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XCLR and 0.50% for SHLD.

XCLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCLR and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer