PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCLR vs. AIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XCLR vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XCLR vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
-5.35%10.25%20.67%15.64%-12.93%3.44%
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
-8.24%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%2.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCLR achieves a -5.35% return, which is significantly higher than AIQ's -8.24% return.


XCLR

1D
1.50%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-5.35%
6M
-3.90%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
10Y*

AIQ

1D
4.22%
1M
-7.14%
YTD
-8.24%
6M
-5.42%
1Y
28.54%
3Y*
24.03%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XCLR vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCLR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XCLR vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCLR
XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCLR vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCLRAIQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

1.06

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

1.61

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.22

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

1.70

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.31

5.71

-0.40

XCLR vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCLR and AIQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCLRAIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.06

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.63

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between XCLR and AIQ is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XCLR vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

XCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.90%, more than AIQ's 0.20% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
13.90%13.15%18.76%1.40%1.01%1.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.20%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%

Drawdowns

XCLR vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCLR drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCLR and AIQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XCLRAIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-44.66%

+30.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-16.47%

+8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.91%

-12.95%

+6.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-9.96%

+5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

4.90%

-2.92%

Volatility

XCLR vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) is 3.39%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that XCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XCLRAIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

9.13%

-5.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

17.83%

-10.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

26.93%

-16.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.58%

24.98%

-14.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.58%

25.41%

-14.83%