XCLN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XCLN.TO (iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF) and ZMMK.TO (BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series) are both exchange-traded funds - XCLN.TO is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while ZMMK.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by BMO. XCLN.TO is passively managed, while ZMMK.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCLN.TO returned 8.97%/yr vs 3.85%/yr for ZMMK.TO. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. XCLN.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ZMMK.TO.

Performance

XCLN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCLN.TO achieves a 43.07% return, which is significantly higher than ZMMK.TO's 0.95% return.

XCLN.TO

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 14.72%
• YTD: 43.07%
• 6M: 37.48%
• 1Y: 84.30%
• 3Y*: 8.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZMMK.TO

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 0.95%
• 6M: 1.13%
• 1Y: 2.48%
• 3Y*: 3.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCLN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XCLN.TO iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF	43.07%	37.41%	-19.86%	-21.98%	13.22%
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series	0.95%	2.77%	4.94%	4.86%	1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between XCLN.TO and ZMMK.TO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2022	-0.04

Return for Risk

XCLN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCLN.TO

XCLN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
XCLN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
XCLN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XCLN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
XCLN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
XCLN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

ZMMK.TO

ZMMK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100
ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ZMMK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
ZMMK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ZMMK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
ZMMK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCLN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCLN.TO	ZMMK.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.15	9.66	-6.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	23.92	-20.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	5.45	-3.95
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.00	82.88	-75.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.91	377.25	-357.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCLN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCLN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is lower than the ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 9.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCLN.TO and ZMMK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCLN.TO	ZMMK.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.15	9.66	-6.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	10.29	-9.96

Drawdowns

XCLN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCLN.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, which is greater than ZMMK.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCLN.TO and ZMMK.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCLN.TO	ZMMK.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.29%	-0.16%	-49.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.10%	-0.03%	-12.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.31%	-0.08%	-39.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	-0.02%	-0.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.54%	-0.00%	-25.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	0.01%	+4.24%

Volatility

XCLN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.50% compared to BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that XCLN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMMK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCLN.TO	ZMMK.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.50%	0.06%	+10.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.24%	0.18%	+20.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.95%	0.26%	+26.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.50%	0.34%	+25.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.50%	0.34%	+25.16%

XCLN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCLN.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMMK.TO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCLN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCLN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than ZMMK.TO's 2.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XCLN.TO iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF	1.04%	1.49%	1.24%	1.15%	0.39%	0.00%
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series	2.53%	3.02%	4.66%	4.98%	1.95%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCLN.TO and ZMMK.TO in my portfolio?

XCLN.TO and ZMMK.TO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XCLN.TO or ZMMK.TO?

On fees, ZMMK.TO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCLN.TO or ZMMK.TO?

ZMMK.TO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XCLN.TO.

What is the main difference between XCLN.TO and ZMMK.TO?

XCLN.TO is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while ZMMK.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XCLN.TO and 0.13% for ZMMK.TO.