XCLN.TO vs. 36BA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN.TO) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (36BA.DE).
XCLN.TO and 36BA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCLN.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Apr 26, 2022. 36BA.DE is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2018. Both XCLN.TO and 36BA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XCLN.TO vs. 36BA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCLN.TO vs. 36BA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCLN.TO iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF | 9.82% | 37.41% | -19.86% | -21.98% | 13.22% |
36BA.DE L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF | -1.62% | 13.53% | 2.39% | 6.38% | 2.36% |
Different Trading Currencies
XCLN.TO is traded in CAD, while 36BA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 36BA.DE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCLN.TO achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly higher than 36BA.DE's -1.62% return.
XCLN.TO
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 49.92%
- 3Y*
- -1.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
36BA.DE
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 6M
- -2.67%
- 1Y
- 5.71%
- 3Y*
- 5.68%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCLN.TO vs. 36BA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCLN.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than 36BA.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XCLN.TO vs. 36BA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCLN.TO
36BA.DE
XCLN.TO vs. 36BA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN.TO) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (36BA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCLN.TO | 36BA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 0.63 | +1.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 0.92 | +1.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.12 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 0.90 | +3.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.27 | 2.99 | +8.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCLN.TO | 36BA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 0.63 | +1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.01 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCLN.TO and 36BA.DE is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XCLN.TO vs. 36BA.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCLN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than 36BA.DE's 4.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCLN.TO iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF | 1.35% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.15% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
36BA.DE L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF | 4.81% | 4.73% | 4.75% | 4.15% | 2.94% | 1.76% | 0.87% |
Drawdowns
XCLN.TO vs. 36BA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCLN.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, which is greater than 36BA.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCLN.TO and 36BA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCLN.TO | 36BA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.29% | -23.68% | -25.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.10% | -4.12% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.43% | -11.71% | -4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.43% | -11.36% | -15.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 1.10% | +3.34% |
Volatility
XCLN.TO vs. 36BA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (36BA.DE) at 3.20%. This indicates that XCLN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36BA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCLN.TO | 36BA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 3.20% | +6.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.05% | 5.17% | +15.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.79% | 9.11% | +17.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 10.33% | +14.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 10.11% | +15.09% |