XCJD.DE vs. XNKY.DE
XCJD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF) and XNKY.DE (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds from Xtrackers - XCJD.DE tracks the MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB while XNKY.DE tracks the Nikkei 225®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCJD.DE returned 10.79%/yr vs 20.83%/yr for XNKY.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCJD.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XNKY.DE.
Performance
XCJD.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCJD.DE achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly lower than XNKY.DE's 32.35% return.
XCJD.DE
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 14.01%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNKY.DE
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 32.35%
- 6M
- 30.39%
- 1Y
- 60.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- —
XCJD.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XCJD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF | 14.53% | 10.16% | 6.89% | 6.37% |
XNKY.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF | 32.35% | 16.16% | 14.34% | 9.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCJD.DE and XNKY.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XCJD.DE and XNKY.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCJD.DE vs. XNKY.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCJD.DE
XNKY.DE
XCJD.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCJD.DE | XNKY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.42 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 4.59 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 13.91 | -5.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCJD.DE | XNKY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 2.53 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.74 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
XCJD.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCJD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.48%, smaller than the maximum XNKY.DE drawdown of -21.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCJD.DE and XNKY.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCJD.DE | XNKY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.48% | -21.47% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -12.99% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -20.16% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -1.43% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -7.84% | +4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 4.29% | -1.14% |
Volatility
XCJD.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) is 3.70%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that XCJD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNKY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCJD.DE | XNKY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 6.59% | -2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | 18.61% | -3.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 23.59% | -4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 18.57% | -1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 18.42% | -1.41% |
XCJD.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCJD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XNKY.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCJD.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCJD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while XNKY.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XCJD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.05% | 1.42% |
XNKY.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCJD.DE and XNKY.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XCJD.DE.
XCJD.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB, while XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCJD.DE and 0.09% for XNKY.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCJD.DE and XNKY.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer