XCJD.DE vs. QUEJ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE).
XCJD.DE and QUEJ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCJD.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB. It was launched on Jan 25, 2023. QUEJ.DE is a passively managed fund by BNP Paribas that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped. It was launched on Feb 15, 2019. Both XCJD.DE and QUEJ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XCJD.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCJD.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XCJD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF | 3.94% | 10.16% | 6.89% | 6.37% |
QUEJ.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 3.58% | 3.79% | 1.15% | 2.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCJD.DE achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly higher than QUEJ.DE's 3.58% return.
XCJD.DE
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 3.94%
- 6M
- 7.33%
- 1Y
- 17.21%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUEJ.DE
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- 1Y
- 8.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCJD.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCJD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QUEJ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XCJD.DE vs. QUEJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCJD.DE
QUEJ.DE
XCJD.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCJD.DE | QUEJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.44 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 0.75 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.09 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 1.20 | +0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | 3.34 | +4.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCJD.DE | QUEJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.44 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.04 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCJD.DE and QUEJ.DE is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XCJD.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCJD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while QUEJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XCJD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF | 1.33% | 1.36% | 2.05% | 1.42% |
QUEJ.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XCJD.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCJD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.48%, which is greater than QUEJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCJD.DE and QUEJ.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCJD.DE | QUEJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.48% | -15.02% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -10.45% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -5.80% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -6.40% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 3.76% | -0.69% |
Volatility
XCJD.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) at 7.30%. This indicates that XCJD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUEJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCJD.DE | QUEJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | 7.30% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.56% | 13.68% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.08% | 18.15% | +1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 15.24% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 15.24% | +1.60% |