PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCIIX vs. TCBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCIIX vs. TCBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund (XCIIX) and The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCIIX achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly higher than TCBIX's 7.52% return. Over the past 10 years, XCIIX has outperformed TCBIX with an annualized return of 10.24%, while TCBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.82% annualized return.


XCIIX

1D
1.45%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
8.53%
6M
8.01%
1Y
12.44%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
10.24%

TCBIX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
7.52%
6M
7.64%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCIIX vs. TCBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCIIX
BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund
8.53%10.59%14.15%20.34%-11.31%21.80%13.34%21.26%-10.58%14.36%
TCBIX
The Covered Bridge Fund
7.52%12.61%4.09%4.09%0.05%18.21%-1.71%18.73%-3.93%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XCIIX and TCBIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between XCIIX and TCBIX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCIIX vs. TCBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCIIX
XCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

TCBIX
TCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCIIX vs. TCBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund (XCIIX) and The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCIIXTCBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.35

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

3.23

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.82

10.84

-8.02

XCIIX vs. TCBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the TCBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCIIX and TCBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCIIX vs. TCBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCIIX drawdown since its inception was -56.56%, which is greater than TCBIX's maximum drawdown of -28.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCIIX and TCBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCIIXTCBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.56%

-28.94%

-27.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.02%

-5.26%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

-12.73%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-17.07%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.23%

-28.94%

-3.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-3.17%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-3.47%

-14.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

1.56%

+3.41%

Volatility

XCIIX vs. TCBIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund (XCIIX) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) at 2.75%. This indicates that XCIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCIIXTCBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

2.75%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.57%

6.13%

+8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

8.77%

+7.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

12.18%

+4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

13.56%

+3.65%

XCIIX vs. TCBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCIIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than TCBIX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCIIX vs. TCBIX - Dividend Comparison

XCIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than TCBIX's 8.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TCBIX
The Covered Bridge Fund
8.24%8.24%7.47%7.34%8.09%6.00%4.70%6.77%11.55%7.32%7.32%5.36%
XCIIX
BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund
0.57%4.36%5.30%6.03%11.97%4.99%5.49%2.89%0.68%0.31%0.00%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCIIX and TCBIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XCIIX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to TCBIX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCIIX dropped -56.56% vs TCBIX's -28.94%.

TCBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCIIX and TCBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer