PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCBIX vs. VASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCBIX vs. VASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund (VASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCBIX achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than VASGX's 10.37% return. Over the past 10 years, TCBIX has underperformed VASGX with an annualized return of 7.67%, while VASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.


TCBIX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
7.98%
6M
7.86%
1Y
17.41%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
7.67%

VASGX

1D
1.03%
1M
1.62%
YTD
10.37%
6M
10.24%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCBIX vs. VASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCBIX
The Covered Bridge Fund
7.98%12.61%4.09%4.09%0.05%18.21%-1.71%18.73%-3.93%9.66%
VASGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund
10.37%19.65%12.95%18.76%-17.21%14.35%15.45%23.14%-6.89%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TCBIX and VASGX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013

0.78

The correlation between TCBIX and VASGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCBIX vs. VASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCBIX
TCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VASGX
VASGX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCBIX vs. VASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund (VASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCBIXVASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.00

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.33

12.96

-1.63

TCBIX vs. VASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCBIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the VASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCBIX and VASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCBIX vs. VASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCBIX drawdown since its inception was -28.94%, smaller than the maximum VASGX drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCBIX and VASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCBIXVASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.94%

-51.16%

+22.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.26%

-8.17%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.73%

-12.89%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.07%

-24.43%

+7.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.94%

-28.53%

-0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-0.44%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-7.24%

+3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.89%

-0.34%

Volatility

TCBIX vs. VASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) is 2.83%, while Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund (VASGX) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that TCBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCBIXVASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

4.47%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.12%

9.14%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.74%

10.99%

-2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.18%

12.88%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

13.53%

+0.03%

TCBIX vs. VASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCBIX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VASGX's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCBIX vs. VASGX - Dividend Comparison

TCBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, more than VASGX's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TCBIX
The Covered Bridge Fund
8.20%8.24%7.47%7.34%8.09%6.00%4.70%6.77%11.55%7.32%7.32%5.36%
VASGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund
3.71%4.09%6.15%3.00%2.10%3.54%3.54%2.34%4.36%2.13%2.23%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCBIX and VASGX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VASGX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to TCBIX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCBIX dropped -28.94% vs VASGX's -51.16%.

VASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCBIX and VASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer