PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCIIX vs. ENHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCIIX vs. ENHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund (XCIIX) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCIIX achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly higher than ENHNX's 7.69% return. Over the past 10 years, XCIIX has outperformed ENHNX with an annualized return of 10.24%, while ENHNX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.16% annualized return.


XCIIX

1D
1.45%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
8.53%
6M
8.01%
1Y
12.44%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
10.24%

ENHNX

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
7.69%
6M
7.48%
1Y
11.96%
3Y*
8.19%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCIIX vs. ENHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCIIX
BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund
8.53%10.59%14.15%20.34%-11.31%21.80%13.34%21.26%-10.58%14.36%
ENHNX
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund
7.69%6.20%6.89%0.99%-1.98%21.67%1.52%18.16%-5.10%10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XCIIX and ENHNX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between XCIIX and ENHNX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCIIX vs. ENHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCIIX
XCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ENHNX
ENHNX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ENHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ENHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCIIX vs. ENHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund (XCIIX) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCIIXENHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

2.01

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.82

5.00

-2.18

XCIIX vs. ENHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the ENHNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCIIX and ENHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCIIX vs. ENHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCIIX drawdown since its inception was -56.56%, which is greater than ENHNX's maximum drawdown of -35.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCIIX and ENHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCIIXENHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.56%

-35.59%

-20.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.02%

-6.34%

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

-13.60%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-18.30%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.23%

-35.59%

+3.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-2.21%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-4.05%

-14.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

2.55%

+2.42%

Volatility

XCIIX vs. ENHNX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund (XCIIX) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX) at 3.17%. This indicates that XCIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCIIXENHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

3.17%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.57%

7.09%

+7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

10.14%

+6.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

12.81%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

15.49%

+1.72%

XCIIX vs. ENHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCIIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ENHNX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCIIX vs. ENHNX - Dividend Comparison

XCIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than ENHNX's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENHNX
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund
5.72%4.38%5.99%6.22%3.82%7.77%5.86%5.69%6.45%6.82%7.67%0.00%
XCIIX
BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund
0.57%4.36%5.30%6.03%11.97%4.99%5.49%2.89%0.68%0.31%0.00%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCIIX and ENHNX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XCIIX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to ENHNX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCIIX dropped -56.56% vs ENHNX's -35.59%.

ENHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCIIX and ENHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer