PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCIIX vs. SCJIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCIIX vs. SCJIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund (XCIIX) and Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund (SCJIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCIIX achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly higher than SCJIX's 3.34% return.


XCIIX

1D
1.45%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
8.53%
6M
8.58%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
10.24%

SCJIX

1D
0.61%
1M
0.13%
YTD
3.34%
6M
3.22%
1Y
15.87%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCIIX vs. SCJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCIIX
BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund
8.53%10.59%14.15%20.34%-11.31%21.80%13.34%21.26%-10.58%-0.41%
SCJIX
Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund
3.34%13.28%16.96%19.43%-12.28%21.59%6.97%20.76%-3.65%-0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XCIIX and SCJIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2017

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between XCIIX and SCJIX has dropped to 0.69 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCIIX vs. SCJIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCIIX
XCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SCJIX
SCJIX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SCJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SCJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCIIX vs. SCJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund (XCIIX) and Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund (SCJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCIIXSCJIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.36

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.87

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.82

8.04

-5.22

XCIIX vs. SCJIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the SCJIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCIIX and SCJIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCIIX vs. SCJIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCIIX drawdown since its inception was -56.56%, which is greater than SCJIX's maximum drawdown of -29.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCIIX and SCJIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCIIXSCJIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.56%

-29.38%

-27.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.02%

-8.52%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

-15.56%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-18.12%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-0.83%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-3.61%

-14.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

1.98%

+2.99%

Volatility

XCIIX vs. SCJIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund (XCIIX) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund (SCJIX) at 3.37%. This indicates that XCIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCJIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCIIXSCJIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

3.37%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.57%

7.42%

+7.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

8.77%

+7.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

12.56%

+4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

14.89%

+2.32%

XCIIX vs. SCJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCIIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than SCJIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCIIX vs. SCJIX - Dividend Comparison

XCIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than SCJIX's 9.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCJIX
Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund
9.29%9.18%12.61%8.45%9.53%25.39%15.45%7.00%10.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCIIX
BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund
0.57%4.36%5.30%6.03%11.97%4.99%5.49%2.89%0.68%0.31%0.00%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCIIX and SCJIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XCIIX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to SCJIX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCIIX dropped -56.56% vs SCJIX's -29.38%.

SCJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCIIX and SCJIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer