PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCJIX vs. ENHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCJIX vs. ENHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund (SCJIX) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCJIX achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly lower than ENHNX's 7.20% return.


SCJIX

1D
0.61%
1M
0.13%
YTD
3.34%
6M
3.22%
1Y
15.87%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*

ENHNX

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
7.20%
6M
6.79%
1Y
12.20%
3Y*
7.17%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCJIX vs. ENHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCJIX
Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund
3.34%13.28%16.96%19.43%-12.28%21.59%6.97%20.76%-3.65%-0.40%
ENHNX
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund
7.20%6.20%6.89%0.99%-1.98%21.67%1.52%18.16%-5.10%0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SCJIX and ENHNX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2017

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between SCJIX and ENHNX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCJIX vs. ENHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCJIX
SCJIX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SCJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SCJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ENHNX
ENHNX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ENHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ENHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCJIX vs. ENHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund (SCJIX) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCJIXENHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.21

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.02

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

5.02

+3.03

SCJIX vs. ENHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCJIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the ENHNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCJIX and ENHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCJIX vs. ENHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCJIX drawdown since its inception was -29.38%, smaller than the maximum ENHNX drawdown of -35.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJIX and ENHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCJIXENHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.38%

-35.59%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-6.34%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-13.60%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.12%

-18.30%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-2.65%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-4.05%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.55%

-0.57%

Volatility

SCJIX vs. ENHNX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund (SCJIX) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX) at 3.15%. This indicates that SCJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCJIXENHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

3.15%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.42%

7.09%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.77%

10.12%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.56%

12.83%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.89%

15.49%

-0.60%

SCJIX vs. ENHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCJIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ENHNX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCJIX vs. ENHNX - Dividend Comparison

SCJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, more than ENHNX's 5.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ENHNX
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund
5.74%4.38%5.99%6.22%3.82%7.77%5.86%5.69%6.45%6.82%7.67%
SCJIX
Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund
9.29%9.18%12.61%8.45%9.53%25.39%15.45%7.00%10.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCJIX and ENHNX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCJIX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to ENHNX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCJIX dropped -29.38% vs ENHNX's -35.59%.

SCJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCJIX and ENHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer