ENHNX vs. TCBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX) and The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX).
ENHNX is managed by Cullen Funds Trust. It was launched on Dec 14, 2015. TCBIX is managed by Covered Bridge. It was launched on Sep 30, 2013.
Performance
ENHNX vs. TCBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ENHNX vs. TCBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENHNX Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund | 4.27% | 6.20% | 6.89% | 0.99% | -1.98% | 21.67% | 1.52% | 18.16% | -5.10% | 10.69% |
TCBIX The Covered Bridge Fund | 2.42% | 12.61% | 4.09% | 4.09% | 0.05% | 18.21% | -1.71% | 18.73% | -3.93% | 9.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENHNX achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly higher than TCBIX's 2.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ENHNX having a 7.03% annualized return and TCBIX not far ahead at 7.10%.
ENHNX
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 4.27%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.03%
TCBIX
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 4.55%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.50%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENHNX vs. TCBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENHNX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TCBIX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ENHNX vs. TCBIX — Risk / Return Rank
ENHNX
TCBIX
ENHNX vs. TCBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX) and The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENHNX | TCBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 1.03 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 1.55 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 1.37 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 6.28 | -4.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENHNX | TCBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 1.03 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.47 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.53 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.52 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between ENHNX and TCBIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ENHNX vs. TCBIX - Dividend Comparison
ENHNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, less than TCBIX's 8.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENHNX Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund | 5.90% | 4.38% | 5.99% | 6.22% | 3.82% | 7.77% | 5.86% | 5.69% | 6.45% | 6.82% | 7.67% | 0.00% |
TCBIX The Covered Bridge Fund | 8.65% | 8.24% | 7.47% | 7.34% | 8.09% | 6.00% | 4.70% | 6.77% | 11.55% | 7.32% | 7.32% | 5.36% |
Drawdowns
ENHNX vs. TCBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENHNX drawdown since its inception was -35.59%, which is greater than TCBIX's maximum drawdown of -28.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHNX and TCBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENHNX | TCBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.59% | -28.94% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -10.24% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.30% | -17.07% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.59% | -28.94% | -6.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.18% | -3.77% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -3.51% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 2.24% | +1.20% |
Volatility
ENHNX vs. TCBIX - Volatility Comparison
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Fund (ENHNX) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) at 2.75%. This indicates that ENHNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ENHNX | TCBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 2.75% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.40% | 6.34% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 13.12% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 12.12% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 13.55% | +1.93% |