XCEM vs. EMDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XCEM (Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF) and EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XCEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index while EMDV tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCEM returned 12.99%/yr vs 2.64%/yr for EMDV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCEM charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EMDV.

Performance

XCEM vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCEM achieves a 38.32% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, XCEM has outperformed EMDV with an annualized return of 12.99%, while EMDV has yielded a comparatively lower 2.64% annualized return.

XCEM

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 12.13%
• YTD: 38.32%
• 6M: 44.13%
• 1Y: 71.14%
• 3Y*: 26.37%
• 5Y*: 11.95%
• 10Y*: 12.99%

EMDV

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 1.13%
• 1Y: 7.88%
• 3Y*: 2.77%
• 5Y*: -3.15%
• 10Y*: 2.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCEM vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF	38.32%	34.05%	0.42%	19.96%	-17.59%	7.87%	9.47%	19.74%	-11.75%	34.78%
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	1.17%	11.90%	0.06%	-1.03%	-18.19%	1.11%	-0.09%	14.93%	-7.52%	26.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XCEM and EMDV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2016	0.69

The correlation between XCEM and EMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCEM vs. EMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XCEM	EMDV
Financial Services	7.7%	24.1%
Communication Services	4.2%	6.2%
Utilities	1.9%	8.3%
Technology	1.1%	22.5%
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	6.2%
Basic Materials	0.7%	1.9%
Industrials	0.4%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	16.4%
Energy	0.2%	-
Healthcare	0.1%	8.2%
Real Estate	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

XCEM vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCEM

XCEM Risk / Return Rank: 90
XCEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
XCEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
XCEM Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XCEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XCEM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

EMDV

EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 22
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 20
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCEM vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCEM	EMDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.42	0.71	+2.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.27	1.07	+3.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.13	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.95	1.09	+3.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.98	3.33	+16.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCEM vs. EMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is higher than the EMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCEM and EMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCEM	EMDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.42	0.71	+2.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	-0.21	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.15	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.22	+0.42

Drawdowns

XCEM vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCEM drawdown since its inception was -41.24%, which is greater than EMDV's maximum drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCEM and EMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCEM	EMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.24%	-39.20%	-2.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.46%	-7.24%	-7.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.92%	-20.71%	+1.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.67%	-34.97%	+5.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.24%	-39.20%	-2.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.25%	-14.80%	+13.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.59%	-13.55%	+4.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	2.37%	+1.20%

Volatility

XCEM vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison

Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) has a higher volatility of 9.43% compared to ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) at 4.17%. This indicates that XCEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCEM	EMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.43%	4.17%	+5.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.72%	9.21%	+9.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.89%	11.21%	+9.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.75%	15.42%	+2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.72%	18.26%	+1.46%

XCEM vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCEM vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison

XCEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than EMDV's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	2.41%	2.46%	2.79%	1.88%	3.68%	2.12%	3.12%	2.38%	1.27%	2.09%	2.87%	0.00%
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF	2.35%	3.25%	2.76%	1.22%	2.42%	1.94%	1.63%	2.11%	2.70%	9.56%	1.24%	2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCEM and EMDV in my portfolio?

XCEM and EMDV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XCEM or EMDV?

XCEM has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to EMDV (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCEM dropped -41.24% vs EMDV's -39.20%.

Which ETF is better, XCEM or EMDV?

On 10-year performance, XCEM leads with 12.99% vs 2.64% for EMDV. On fees, XCEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, EMDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XCEM or EMDV?

Over the 10-year period, XCEM has performed better with a 12.99% return vs 2.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCEM or EMDV?

XCEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCEM or EMDV?

EMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 2.35% for XCEM.

What is the main difference between XCEM and EMDV?

XCEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while EMDV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XCEM and 0.60% for EMDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XCEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.