PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCCC vs. USHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCCC vs. USHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than USHY's 1.42% return.


XCCC

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.38%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
10.79%
5Y*
10Y*

USHY

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.77%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCCC vs. USHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
-0.05%7.25%13.01%20.57%-5.33%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.42%8.81%8.45%12.73%-3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between XCCC and USHY is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022

0.87

The correlation between XCCC and USHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCCC vs. USHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCCC
USHY

Communication Services

12.8%

-

Energy

3.9%
99.2%

Industrials

3.7%

-

Real Estate

3.7%
0.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Healthcare

3.2%

-

Technology

2.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%

-

Financial Services

0.7%

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

XCCC
12.8%
USHY

-

Energy

XCCC
3.9%
USHY
99.2%

Industrials

XCCC
3.7%
USHY

-

Real Estate

XCCC
3.7%
USHY
0.8%

Basic Materials

XCCC
3.2%
USHY

-

Healthcare

XCCC
3.2%
USHY

-

Technology

XCCC
2.8%
USHY

-

Consumer Cyclical

XCCC
1.8%
USHY

-

Consumer Defensive

XCCC
0.9%
USHY

-

Financial Services

XCCC
0.7%
USHY

-

Utilities

XCCC

-

USHY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCCC vs. USHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCCC
XCCC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

USHY
USHY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
USHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
USHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCCC vs. USHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCCCUSHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.37

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.90

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

13.03

-9.31

XCCC vs. USHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the USHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCCC and USHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCCCUSHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.93

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.58

+0.38

Drawdowns

XCCC vs. USHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum USHY drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and USHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCCCUSHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.99%

-22.44%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-2.43%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.99%

-4.66%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-0.27%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-2.67%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

0.54%

+0.99%

Volatility

XCCC vs. USHY - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that XCCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCCCUSHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

1.13%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.02%

2.91%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.25%

3.65%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.82%

7.34%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.82%

8.25%

+0.57%

XCCC vs. USHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCCC vs. USHY - Dividend Comparison

XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than USHY's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.92%6.79%6.89%6.63%6.08%5.07%5.30%5.92%6.30%0.73%
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
10.05%10.06%10.68%12.05%7.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCCC and USHY have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XCCC has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to USHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCCC dropped -10.99% vs USHY's -22.44%.

On 3-year performance, XCCC leads with 10.79% vs 8.91% for USHY. On fees, USHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XCCC has performed better with a 10.79% return vs 8.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XCCC.

XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.05%, compared with 6.92% for USHY.

XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index, while USHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for XCCC and 0.15% for USHY.

USHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCCC and USHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer