PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XC vs. UEVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XC vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XC vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
-3.53%18.19%5.49%21.31%1.49%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.20%22.74%11.92%17.41%4.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XC achieves a -3.53% return, which is significantly lower than UEVM's 3.20% return.


XC

1D
3.04%
1M
-8.43%
YTD
-3.53%
6M
0.10%
1Y
17.84%
3Y*
11.68%
5Y*
10Y*

UEVM

1D
2.22%
1M
-5.98%
YTD
3.20%
6M
4.71%
1Y
25.75%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XC vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XC vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XC
XC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XC vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCUEVMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.47

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

2.00

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

2.06

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.13

8.65

-3.52

XC vs. UEVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XC Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the UEVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XC and UEVM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCUEVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.47

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.30

+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between XC and UEVM is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XC vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison

XC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.42%, more than UEVM's 3.74% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
12.42%11.74%1.49%1.42%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.74%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%

Drawdowns

XC vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XC drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XC and UEVM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XCUEVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.97%

-45.44%

+24.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-12.47%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.41%

-7.37%

-2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-11.86%

+7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

2.97%

+0.42%

Volatility

XC vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) have volatilities of 7.82% and 7.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XCUEVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

7.82%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.76%

11.81%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

17.59%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

15.85%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

18.42%

-2.69%