XC vs. TJUN
XC (WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - XC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XC returned 7.41% vs 8.16% for TJUN. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XC charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.
Performance
XC vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XC achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's -1.24% return.
XC
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- 6M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 7.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.81%
TJUN
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -3.34%
- YTD
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $28.96K | $85.30K | $113.88K | |
| $811.45K | $489.30K | $569.06K |
XC vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 0.10% | 10.04% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | -1.24% | 11.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between XC and TJUN is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XC and TJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XC vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank
XC
TJUN
XC vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XC | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.16 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 0.79 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | 3.49 | -2.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XC vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XC drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -9.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XC and TJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XC | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.97% | -9.77% | -11.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.47% | -9.77% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.00% | -6.61% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -1.08% | -3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 2.21% | +2.93% |
Volatility
XC vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) is 4.16%, while FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that XC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XC | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 6.70% | -2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 9.43% | +3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.98% | 10.70% | +4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 10.42% | +5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 10.42% | +5.41% |
XC vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
XC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XC vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison
XC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 12.01% | 11.74% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XC and TJUN have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TJUN has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to XC (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XC dropped -20.97% vs TJUN's -9.77%.
On 1-year performance, TJUN leads with 8.16% vs 7.41% for XC. On fees, XC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, XC has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TJUN has performed better with a 8.16% return vs 7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.
XC has the higher dividend yield at 12.01%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.
XC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. XC tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TJUN tracks iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XC and 0.95% for TJUN.
TJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XC and TJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer