XC vs. EMC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XC (WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) and EMC (Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. XC is passively managed, while EMC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XC returned 10.25%/yr vs 15.87%/yr for EMC. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XC charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EMC.

Performance

XC vs. EMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XC achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than EMC's 21.44% return.

XC

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: -2.14%
• 6M: -2.43%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 10.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMC

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 21.44%
• 6M: 22.40%
• 1Y: 29.23%
• 3Y*: 15.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XC vs. EMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	-2.14%	18.19%	5.49%	16.27%
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF	21.44%	18.91%	3.75%	1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XC and EMC is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2023	0.80

The correlation between XC and EMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XC vs. EMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XC

XC Risk / Return Rank: 12
XC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
XC Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
XC Omega Ratio Rank: 12
XC Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
XC Martin Ratio Rank: 13

EMC

EMC Risk / Return Rank: 44
EMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
EMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
EMC Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
EMC Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XC vs. EMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XC	EMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	1.29	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.48	1.82	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.25	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.31	2.11	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.82	7.48	-6.66

XC vs. EMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XC Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the EMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XC and EMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XC vs. EMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XC drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, which is greater than EMC's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XC and EMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XC	EMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.97%	-18.38%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.47%	-13.89%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.97%	-18.38%	-2.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.11%	-4.72%	-3.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-4.11%	-0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	3.92%	+0.80%

Volatility

XC vs. EMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) is 5.04%, while Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that XC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XC	EMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	11.79%	-6.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.19%	20.84%	-7.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.07%	22.88%	-7.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.91%	19.29%	-3.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.91%	19.29%	-3.38%

XC vs. EMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EMC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XC vs. EMC - Dividend Comparison

XC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.25%, more than EMC's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF	0.65%	0.78%	1.13%	0.89%	0.00%
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	12.25%	11.74%	1.49%	1.42%	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XC and EMC in my portfolio?

XC and EMC have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XC or EMC?

EMC has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to XC (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XC dropped -20.97% vs EMC's -18.38%.

Which ETF is better, XC or EMC?

On 3-year performance, EMC leads with 15.87% vs 10.25% for XC. On fees, XC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, XC has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XC or EMC?

Over the 3-year period, EMC has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XC or EMC?

XC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XC or EMC?

XC has the higher dividend yield at 12.25%, compared with 0.65% for EMC.

What is the main difference between XC and EMC?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XC and 0.75% for EMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.