XC vs. DIEM
XC (WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) and DIEM (Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XC tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net while DIEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XC returned 9.35%/yr vs 23.29%/yr for DIEM. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XC charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DIEM.
Performance
XC vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XC achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than DIEM's 24.05% return.
XC
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- 6M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 7.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.81%
DIEM
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- YTD
- 24.05%
- 1Y
- 41.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 8.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.97M | $1.53M | $960.12K | |
| $811.45K | $489.30K | $569.06K |
XC vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 0.10% | 18.19% | 5.49% | 21.31% | 1.58% |
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 24.05% | 30.81% | 12.29% | 15.41% | 5.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between XC and DIEM is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between XC and DIEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XC vs. DIEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XC
DIEM
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
XC
DIEM
Consumer Cyclical
XC
DIEM
Industrials
XC
DIEM
Basic Materials
XC
DIEM
Consumer Defensive
XC
DIEM
Communication Services
XC
DIEM
Healthcare
XC
DIEM
Energy
XC
DIEM
Real Estate
XC
DIEM
Utilities
XC
DIEM
Technology
XC
DIEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XC vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank
XC
DIEM
XC vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XC | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.34 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 3.03 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | 9.86 | -8.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XC vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XC drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XC and DIEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XC | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.97% | -38.61% | +17.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.47% | -13.59% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.97% | -16.82% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.00% | -9.21% | +3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -9.67% | +5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 4.17% | +0.97% |
Volatility
XC vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) is 4.16%, while Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a volatility of 8.98%. This indicates that XC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XC | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 8.98% | -4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 21.15% | -7.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.98% | 22.81% | -7.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 17.99% | -2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 18.04% | -2.21% |
XC vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XC vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison
XC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, more than DIEM's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 2.99% | 2.99% | 4.92% | 4.45% | 6.31% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 5.98% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 0.35% |
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 12.01% | 11.74% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XC and DIEM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIEM has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to XC (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XC dropped -20.97% vs DIEM's -38.61%.
On 3-year performance, DIEM leads with 23.29% vs 9.35% for XC. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XC has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 23.29% return vs 9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for XC.
XC has the higher dividend yield at 12.01%, compared with 2.99% for DIEM.
XC tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XC and 0.19% for DIEM.
DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XC and DIEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer