PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XC vs. DIEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XC vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XC achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than DIEM's 24.05% return.


XC

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.18%
6M
-3.23%
YTD
0.10%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.81%

DIEM

1D
0.86%
1M
-1.21%
6M
14.49%
YTD
24.05%
1Y
41.57%
3Y*
23.29%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
8.16%
ALL TIME*
8.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.97M$1.53M$960.12K
$811.45K$489.30K$569.06K

XC vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
0.10%18.19%5.49%21.31%1.58%
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
24.05%30.81%12.29%15.41%5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between XC and DIEM is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2022

0.81

The correlation between XC and DIEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XC vs. DIEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XC
DIEM

Financial Services

31.9%
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
5.5%

Industrials

10.9%
4.2%

Basic Materials

10.0%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
3.3%

Communication Services

6.3%
4.8%

Healthcare

4.9%
0.8%

Energy

4.5%
5.4%

Real Estate

4.0%
1.5%

Utilities

3.8%
3.6%

Technology

3.5%
41.6%

Financial Services

XC
31.9%
DIEM
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XC
12.1%
DIEM
5.5%

Industrials

XC
10.9%
DIEM
4.2%

Basic Materials

XC
10.0%
DIEM
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

XC
8.0%
DIEM
3.3%

Communication Services

XC
6.3%
DIEM
4.8%

Healthcare

XC
4.9%
DIEM
0.8%

Energy

XC
4.5%
DIEM
5.4%

Real Estate

XC
4.0%
DIEM
1.5%

Utilities

XC
3.8%
DIEM
3.6%

Technology

XC
3.5%
DIEM
41.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XC vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XC
XC Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XC Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XC Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XC vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCDIEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.34

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

3.03

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.48

9.86

-8.38

XC vs. DIEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XC Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the DIEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XC and DIEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XC vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XC drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XC and DIEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCDIEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.97%

-38.61%

+17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-13.59%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.97%

-16.82%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.00%

-9.21%

+3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.25%

-9.67%

+5.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

4.17%

+0.97%

Volatility

XC vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) is 4.16%, while Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a volatility of 8.98%. This indicates that XC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCDIEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

8.98%

-4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

21.15%

-7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.98%

22.81%

-7.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

17.99%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.83%

18.04%

-2.21%

XC vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

XC vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison

XC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, more than DIEM's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.99%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
12.01%11.74%1.49%1.42%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XC and DIEM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIEM has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to XC (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XC dropped -20.97% vs DIEM's -38.61%.

On 3-year performance, DIEM leads with 23.29% vs 9.35% for XC. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XC has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 23.29% return vs 9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for XC.

XC has the higher dividend yield at 12.01%, compared with 2.99% for DIEM.

XC tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XC and 0.19% for DIEM.

DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XC and DIEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer