XBTY vs. XBCI

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF) and XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while XBCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBTY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XBCI.

Performance

XBTY vs. XBCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XBTY

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: -7.49%
• YTD: -19.17%
• 6M: -19.19%
• 1Y: -35.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XBCI

• 1D: -8.54%
• 1M: -18.33%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBTY vs. XBCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF	-10.81%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	-12.85%

Correlation

The correlation between XBTY and XBCI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026	0.90

Return for Risk

XBTY vs. XBCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBTY

XBTY Risk / Return Rank: 1
XBTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
XBTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
XBTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
XBTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
XBTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBTY vs. XBCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XBTY	XBCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.25	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.78	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XBTY	XBCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.25	-0.52	-0.73

Drawdowns

XBTY vs. XBCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBTY drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, which is greater than XBCI's maximum drawdown of -22.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBTY and XBCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBTY	XBCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.23%	-22.93%	-22.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.23%	-22.93%	-22.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.95%	-7.84%	-15.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XBTY	XBCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.55%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.20%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.34%	67.14%	-38.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.01%	67.14%	-39.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.01%	67.14%	-39.13%

XBTY vs. XBCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XBCI's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBTY vs. XBCI - Dividend Comparison

XBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 239.89%, more than XBCI's 15.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	15.53%	0.00%
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF	239.89%	102.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBTY and XBCI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, XBTY and XBCI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XBTY or XBCI?

On fees, XBCI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBTY or XBCI?

XBCI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for XBTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBTY or XBCI?

XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 239.89%, compared with 15.53% for XBCI.

What is the main difference between XBTY and XBCI?

XBTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while XBCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for XBTY and 0.98% for XBCI.