XBNB vs. RSMV

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

XBNB (Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF) and RSMV (Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBNB is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Binance Coin (BNB), while RSMV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Teucrium. XBNB is passively managed, while RSMV is actively managed. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XBNB charges 1.89%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for RSMV.

Performance

XBNB vs. RSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF (XBNB) and Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XBNB

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 10.37%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

RSMV

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: -0.60%
• 6M: 5.63%
• YTD: 6.17%
• 1Y: 16.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	$150.10K	$148.38K	$248.92K
XBNB Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF	$4.00K	$3.54K	$6.15K

XBNB vs. RSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XBNB Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF	-18.70%
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between XBNB and RSMV is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026	0.43

Return for Risk

XBNB vs. RSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XBNB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RSMV

RSMV Risk / Return Rank: 47
RSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
RSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
RSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 41
RSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
RSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XBNB vs. RSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF (XBNB) and Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBNB	RSMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.24	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.75	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.34	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.12	—

Drawdowns

XBNB vs. RSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBNB drawdown since its inception was -40.97%, which is greater than RSMV's maximum drawdown of -17.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBNB and RSMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBNB	RSMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.97%	-17.58%	-23.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.46%	-3.51%	-28.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.96%	-3.87%	-19.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XBNB	RSMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.05%	13.80%	+66.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.05%	15.09%	+64.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.05%	15.09%	+64.96%

XBNB vs. RSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBNB has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than RSMV's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBNB vs. RSMV - Dividend Comparison

XBNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than RSMV's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	0.94%	1.00%
XBNB Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF	0.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBNB and RSMV in my portfolio?

XBNB and RSMV have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XBNB or RSMV?

On fees, RSMV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBNB or RSMV?

RSMV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XBNB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBNB or RSMV?

RSMV has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.01% for XBNB.

What is the main difference between XBNB and RSMV?

XBNB is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while RSMV is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.89% for XBNB and 0.95% for RSMV.