XBLC.L vs. CSNDX.MI
XBLC.L (Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C) and CSNDX.MI (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XBLC.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while CSNDX.MI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XBLC.L returned 0.08%/yr vs 18.66%/yr for CSNDX.MI. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBLC.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CSNDX.MI.
Performance
XBLC.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBLC.L achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than CSNDX.MI's 20.42% return.
XBLC.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 1.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
CSNDX.MI
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 19.45%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.66%
- 10Y*
- 21.25%
XBLC.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBLC.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 0.55% | 2.95% | 4.36% | 7.51% | -13.29% | -1.05% | 2.52% | 6.28% | -1.52% | 0.63% |
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 20.42% | 6.74% | 35.09% | 50.07% | -30.24% | 39.83% | 35.45% | 41.91% | 3.62% | 7.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBLC.L and CSNDX.MI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBLC.L vs. CSNDX.MI — Risk / Return Rank
XBLC.L
CSNDX.MI
XBLC.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBLC.L | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.42 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 3.79 | -3.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | 11.18 | -8.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBLC.L | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 2.42 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.94 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 1.07 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
XBLC.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBLC.L drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, smaller than the maximum CSNDX.MI drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBLC.L and CSNDX.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBLC.L | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -31.19% | +14.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -9.95% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.67% | -26.71% | +24.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.18% | -31.19% | +14.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.81% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -5.43% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 3.37% | -2.60% |
Volatility
XBLC.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) is 1.18%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that XBLC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSNDX.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBLC.L | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 4.28% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.65% | 10.79% | -8.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01% | 15.61% | -12.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 19.79% | -15.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 19.61% | -14.90% |
XBLC.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBLC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CSNDX.MI's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBLC.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Dividend Comparison
Neither XBLC.L nor CSNDX.MI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XBLC.L and CSNDX.MI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBLC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBLC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.
XBLC.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while CSNDX.MI is Nasdaq-100. XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while CSNDX.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XBLC.L and 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.
Find the right allocation for XBLC.L and CSNDX.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer