XBLC.L vs. ECRP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) and Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (ECRP.L).
XBLC.L and ECRP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XBLC.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. It was launched on Feb 23, 2010. ECRP.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. It was launched on Nov 11, 2016. Both XBLC.L and ECRP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XBLC.L vs. ECRP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XBLC.L vs. ECRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBLC.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | -0.60% | 2.95% | 4.36% | 7.51% | -13.29% | -1.05% | 1.52% |
ECRP.L Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) | -0.35% | 2.70% | 4.25% | 7.23% | -13.17% | -1.21% | 1.69% |
Different Trading Currencies
XBLC.L is traded in EUR, while ECRP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ECRP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBLC.L achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than ECRP.L's -0.35% return.
XBLC.L
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- —
ECRP.L
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XBLC.L vs. ECRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBLC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ECRP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XBLC.L vs. ECRP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XBLC.L
ECRP.L
XBLC.L vs. ECRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) and Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (ECRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBLC.L | ECRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.61 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 0.94 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.12 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 0.75 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.86 | 3.12 | +0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBLC.L | ECRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.61 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | -0.05 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.01 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between XBLC.L and ECRP.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XBLC.L vs. ECRP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XBLC.L nor ECRP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XBLC.L vs. ECRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBLC.L drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, roughly equal to the maximum ECRP.L drawdown of -17.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBLC.L and ECRP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBLC.L | ECRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -21.22% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -3.87% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.18% | -16.71% | -0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -6.67% | +4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -11.24% | +6.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 1.31% | -0.70% |
Volatility
XBLC.L vs. ECRP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) is 1.62%, while Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (ECRP.L) has a volatility of 1.89%. This indicates that XBLC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XBLC.L | ECRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 1.89% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.98% | 2.56% | -0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63% | 3.94% | -1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.31% | 5.34% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 6.42% | -1.71% |