PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBI vs. SHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBI vs. SHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBI achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly higher than SHW's -0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, XBI has underperformed SHW with an annualized return of 9.98%, while SHW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.83% annualized return.


XBI

1D
1.95%
1M
4.37%
YTD
11.87%
6M
11.41%
1Y
63.76%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
9.98%

SHW

1D
0.93%
1M
6.99%
YTD
-0.69%
6M
-2.03%
1Y
-3.77%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
13.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBI vs. SHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
11.87%35.89%1.01%7.60%-25.87%-20.45%48.33%32.56%-15.28%43.77%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
-0.69%-3.83%9.90%32.73%-31.96%44.90%27.05%49.70%-3.23%54.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XBI and SHW is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006

0.41

The correlation between XBI and SHW shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBI vs. SHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBI
XBI Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SHW
SHW Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHW Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHW Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBI vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XBISHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.99

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.59

-0.18

+6.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.47

-0.37

+19.84

XBI vs. SHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the SHW Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBI and SHW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBI vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBI drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than SHW's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBI and SHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBISHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.89%

-52.02%

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-21.36%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.99%

-25.69%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.71%

-42.46%

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.89%

-42.46%

-21.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.16%

-18.78%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.93%

-11.63%

-9.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

10.26%

-6.97%

Volatility

XBI vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) has a higher volatility of 10.55% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) at 9.00%. This indicates that XBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBISHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.55%

9.00%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.83%

19.26%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.18%

24.88%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.22%

26.27%

+5.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.03%

26.60%

+5.43%

Dividends

XBI vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison

XBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than SHW's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
0.99%0.98%0.84%0.78%1.01%0.62%0.73%0.77%0.87%0.83%1.25%1.03%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
0.32%0.37%0.15%0.02%0.00%0.04%0.20%0.00%0.28%0.24%0.26%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBI and SHW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XBI has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to SHW (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBI dropped -63.89% vs SHW's -52.02%.

XBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBI and SHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer