XBFR vs. PQAP
XBFR (Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBFR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.
Performance
XBFR vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBFR
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PQAP
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 20.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBFR vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBFR Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 4.18% |
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April | 9.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBFR and PQAP is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBFR vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank
XBFR
PQAP
XBFR vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBFR | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 1.64 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
XBFR vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBFR drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum PQAP drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBFR and PQAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBFR | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -10.79% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.13% | -1.50% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -0.61% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.27% | — |
Volatility
XBFR vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBFR | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.00% | 4.68% | +3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.00% | 11.07% | -3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.00% | 11.07% | -3.07% |
XBFR vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBFR vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison
XBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, more than PQAP's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April | 0.02% | 0.02% |
XBFR Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBFR and PQAP have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBFR.
XBFR and PQAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.03%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBFR and 0.50% for PQAP.
Find the right allocation for XBFR and PQAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer