PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBFR vs. PQAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBFR vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XBFR

1D
-2.13%
1M
1.22%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PQAP

1D
-1.39%
1M
0.19%
YTD
10.55%
6M
11.29%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBFR vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XBFR and PQAP is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBFR vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBFR

PQAP
PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBFR vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XBFR vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBFRPQAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

1.64

+0.33

Drawdowns

XBFR vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBFR drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum PQAP drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBFR and PQAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBFRPQAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-10.79%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-1.50%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-0.61%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

Volatility

XBFR vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBFRPQAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.00%

4.68%

+3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.00%

11.07%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.00%

11.07%

-3.07%

XBFR vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBFR vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

XBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, more than PQAP's 0.02% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XBFR and PQAP have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBFR.

XBFR and PQAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.03%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBFR and 0.50% for PQAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBFR and PQAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer